AI Innovation Institute

Kate Armstrong, a Vancouver-based artist, writer, and independent curator, will explore the role of AI in art and creativity through three AI-driven projects: KEKE Terminal, Botto, and Sasha Stiles' AI collaborator Technelegy. She will compare these projects to historical artistic movements and investigate AI's role as an autonomous creative agent, the function of community participation, and the shifting dynamics of authorship.

Location: Humanities Institute Room 1008

Abstract: Trustworthy AI deployment in high-stakes domains requires systems that are fair, private, robust, and controllable as they scale. Yet these demands are often pursued through ad-hoc approaches, lacking a systematic understanding of the inherent trade-offs between competing objectives. We add fairness regularizers and hope bias decreases. We train on massive datasets and hope the model learns the underlying logic of how concepts combine, rather than memorizing statistical shortcuts. We encrypt data and hope the resulting computational overhead remains manageable. But hope isnot a science.
In this talk, I argue that what trustworthy AI lacks is not better heuristics but a deeper science of what these properties fundamentally cost and what is achievable. Before we can fix a system, we must map the terrain: what trade-offs are unavoidable, what regions of performance areunreachable, and how far current methods fall from what is actually achievable. My research builds this map across fairness, privacy, robustness, and controllability, following a common methodology: diagnose where models fail, characterize the fundamental limits any method must obey, and design systems that approach those limits. I will present this framework, its extension to scientific applications where we replace statistical constraints with physical laws to ensure AI systems remain grounded in reality, and a vision for scaling these principles to the rapidly expanding ecosystem of composed and interacting AI systems.


Bio: Dr. Vishnu Boddeti is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Michigan State University, where he leads the Human Analysis Lab (HAL). His research develops mathematical frameworks for trustworthy AI, spanning fairness, privacy, robustness, and physics-informed learning, with an emphasis on characterizing fundamental limits and building systems that achieve them. His work has been supported by NSF, NIST, DARPA, ONR, Ford, and others, and recognized with a Meta Research Award (2021). His research has been featured on the cover of Nature, recognized as an Editor's Highlight in Nature Communications, and received multiple best paper awards, including the 2024 IEEE-CCF Cloud Computing Best Paper Award and the TMLR Outstanding Certification Finalist (2023). He serves as Senior Area Editor for IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security and completed his PhD in ECE from Carnegie Mellon University in 2012.

Location: NCS 120

We live in a new scientific paradigm: the Big Data era, in which a lot of data is available for almost anything. In this new paradigm, the driving force is to use data directly to learn about chemical and physics systems employing artificial intelligence. This paradigm has proven helpful in simulating realistic physical, biological, and chemical models, yielding impressive results. Similarly, the insight gained in these situations can be used to improve our understanding of fundamental processes. In that regard, we want to answer the question: Can a machine learn chemistry? The answer to this question is still debatable, but we will show our ideas and methods to find the answer. We will also discuss our results on predicting atom-diatom reactions and other avenues and work in progress in our group.

Please register for the STEM Speaker Series: Can a Machine learn Chemistry here.

Abstract: Drawing on group-theoretic and information-theoretic foundations, we propose information lattice learning (ILL) as a general framework to learn rules of a signal (e.g., an image or a probability distribution). In our definition, a rule is a coarsened signal used to help us gain one interpretable insight about the original signal. To make full sense of what might govern the signal's intrinsic structure, we seek multiple disentangled rules arranged in a hierarchy, called a lattice. Compared to representation/rule-learning models optimized for a specific task (e.g., classification), ILL focuses on explainability: it is designed to mimic human experiential learning and discover rules akin to those humans can distill and comprehend. We will detail the mathematical foundations and algorithms of ILL, and illustrate how it addresses the fundamental question what makes X an X by creating rule-based explanations designed to help humans understand. Our focus is on explaining X rather than (re)generating it. We show ILL's efficacy and interpretability on benchmarks and assessments, as well as a demonstration of ILL-enhanced classifiers achieving human-level digit recognition using only one or a few MNIST training examples (1-10 per class). We present applications in knowledge discovery, using ILL to distill music theory from scores and chemical laws from molecules and further revealing connections between them. We close with some early work on understanding the principles that govern scattering amplitudes in Super Yang-Mills theory, rather than just predicting them.

Biography: Lav R. Varshney is the Della Pietra Infinity Professor and inaugural director of the AI Innovation Institute at Stony Brook University. He is co-founder and CEO of Kocree, Inc., a startup company building novel human-controllable AI for discovery and creativity, and chief scientist of Ensaras, Inc., a startup company focused on AI and wastewater treatment. He holds appointments at RAND Corporation and at Brookhaven National Laboratory. He was previously on the faculty of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, a visiting scholar at Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management, a principal research scientist at Salesforce Research AI, and a research staff member at IBM Research. He is a former White House staffer, having served on the National Security Council staff as a White House Fellow, where he contributed to national AI and wireless communications policy. His research interests include information theory and artificial intelligence. He received his B.S. degree from Cornell University and his S.M. and Ph.D. degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Location: Room 102

CSE 656 Seminars in Computer Vision - Wednesdays 11:30am-12:50pm, Room NCS 120

The overall purpose of this seminar is to bring together people with interests in Computer Vision theory and techniques and to examine current research issues. This course will be appropriate for people who already took a Computer Vision graduate course or already had research experience in Computer Vision. To enroll in this course, you must either: (1) be in the PhD program or (2) receive permission from the instructors.

Each seminar will consist of multiple short talks (around 10 minutes) by multiple people. Students can register for 1 credit for CSE656. Registered students must attend and present a minimum of 2 or 3 talks. Everyone else is welcome to attend. Fill in https://forms.gle/pCVXovgfMfQwGqG38 to subscribe to our mailing list for further announcement.

The first meeting will be Wed Jan 29 at 11.30am, room 120 New CS. The meeting will deal with organizational matters and we will start right away with some presentations. Send David Paredes Merino <dparedesmeri@cs.stonybrook.edu> an email if you are interested but cannot attend the first meeting. Please forward to people outside the CS department that you think might be interested.

Abstract: Recent advances in Spatial Transcriptomics (ST) pair histology images with spatially resolved gene expression profiles, enabling predictions of gene expression across different tissue locations based on image patches. This opens up new possibilities for enhancing whole slide image (WSI) prediction tasks with localized gene expression. However, existing methods do not fully leverage the interactions between different tissue locations, which are crucial for accurate joint prediction. To address this, we introduce MERGE (Multi-faceted hiErarchical gRaph for Gene Expressions), which combines a multi-faceted hierarchical graph construction strategy with graph neural networks (GNN) to improve gene expression predictions from WSIs. By clustering tissue image patches based on both spatial and morphological features, and incorporating intra- and inter-cluster edges, our approach fosters interactions between distant tissue locations during GNN learning. As an additional contribution, we evaluate different data smoothing techniques that are necessary to mitigate artifacts in ST data, often caused by technical imperfections. We advocate for adopting gene-aware smoothing methods that are more biologically justified. Experimental results on gene expression prediction show that our GNN method outperforms state-of-the-art techniques on multiple metrics such as mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). Qualitative analysis establishes the effectiveness of MERGE in capturing cancer marker genes, thus consolidating its utility in diagnostics. As an extension of this work, we use MERGE in a setting with an uncertainty calibration branch to perform robust gene expression smoothing. We show that using patch-wise uncertainty from an uncertainty calibration model and the gene expression predictions from MERGE to enrich the ground truth gene expression matrix, results in better alignment with pathologist annotations, thus establishing that the smoothing is biologically informed.

Speaker: Aniruddha Ganguly

Location: Virtual Zoom Meeting


https://stonybrook.zoom.us/j/5474847973?pwd=Sng0Q2h1c1d3cm9sbFBmYUczMHZNdz09
Meeting ID: 547 484 7973
Passcode: 206739

Abstract: Sub-grid turbulence is challenging to resolve in climate models; therefore, it is parameterized. Traditionally, turbulent parameterizations have relied on physics-based and equation-based approaches. However, ad hoc and uncertain components in these parameterizations introduce uncertainty in future climate predictions. Recently, data-driven techniques have emerged as an alternative for modeling sub-grid fluxes. I will demonstrate the use of machine learning to model vertical turbulent fluxes in the ocean surface boundary layer and its impact on reducing biases in NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory ocean climate model.

I will show how neural networks, trained to predict the eddy diffusivity profile from high-fidelity yet computationally expensive turbulence schemes, enhance the vertical mixing scheme in the climate model. These networks replace ad hoc components while maintaining the conservation principles of the standard ocean model equations. The enhanced scheme outperforms its predecessor by reducing biases in the mixed-layer depth and modestly improving tropical upper-ocean stratification in ocean-only global simulations. Furthermore, simplified equations that can replace the neural networks show similar improvements but with lower computational cost and better interpretability. They point to structural deficiencies in the baseline parameterization. This work is one of the first successful applications of machine learning to improve a sub-grid parameterization of turbulent mixing in ocean climate models.

IACS Seminar Speaker: Aakash Sane, Princeton University

Location: IACS Seminar Room or Zoom

Join Zoom Meeting: https://stonybrook.zoom.us/j/97764942108?pwd=MzCWupCe3L9mKdrgfO2bJg3GBbvXuf.1
Meeting ID: 977 6494 2108
Passcode: 519324

How to Succeed in Language Design Without Really Trying presented by Professor Brian Kernighan

ABSTRACT: Why do some languages succeed while others fall by the wayside? I've helped create nearly a dozen languages (mostly small) over the years; a handful are still in widespread use, while others have languished or simply disappeared. I've also been present at the creation of several other languages, including some really major ones. In this talk I'll give my humble, but correct, opinion on factors that affect success and failure, and try to offer some insight into what to do if you're trying to design a new language yourself, and why that might be a good thing.

BIO: Brian Kernighan received a PhD in electrical engineering from Princeton in 1969. He joined the Computer Science department at Princeton in 2000, after many years at Bell Labs. He is a co-creator of several programming languages, including AWK and AMPL, and of a number of tools for document preparation. He is the co-author of a dozen books and some technical papers, and holds 5 patents.
He is a member of the National Academy of Engineering and of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. His research areas include programming languages, tools and interfaces that make computers easier to use, often for non-specialist users. He has also written two books on technology for
non-technical audiences: Understanding the Digital World in 2017 and Millions, Billions, Zillions: Defending Yourself in a World of Too Many Numbers, published in 2018. His most recent book, Unix: A History and a Memoir, was published in October 2019.