AI on Campus: Your Thoughts, Your Future

Join the Conversation: Share Your Thoughts about Learning, Academics, and AI

The world of college is changing fast, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at the center of it. We are part of the Institute on AI, Pedagogy, and the Curriculum with AAC&U, and we need to hear from the people AI affects most: you!

This is an open discussion for all students to share their honest experiences, their top concerns, and their best ideas about AI in our academic environment. We'll be diving into these key questions:

  • How can AI actually make learning better or easier? What opportunities do you see for using AI tools to enhance your assignments, research, or skills?

  • What are your biggest worries about AI? Is it about cheating, being graded fairly, or preparing for the job market? How is AI impacting your workload or stress levels?

  • What specific tools, workshops, or policies would help you use AI responsibly and successfully? (Think training, software, or clear rules.)

Dates/Times:

  • Wednesday, 2/4 at 2pm

  • Thursday, 2/5 at 12pm

Please register in advance for the Zoom link.

Can't Make It? Share Your Feedback!

Don't worry if you can't attend! You can still share your thoughts via video in our AI Zoom Room or via email: rose.tirotta-esposito@stonybrook.edu.

Videos will not be shared publicly and comments will only be shared in aggregate.

Your voice matters. Come tell us how AI is affecting your studies, your stress, and your success!

  • Dr. Rose Tirotta-Esposito (Assistant Provost; Director of CELT)

  • Dr. Elizabeth Hewitt (Associate Professor in the Department of Technology and Society (DTS) in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences)

  • Chris Kretz (Associate Librarian and Head of Academic Engagement at SBU Libraries)

  • Prof. Rajiv Lajmi (Assistant Professor in the School of Health Professions and Chair of Applied Health Informatics)

  • Dr. Matthew Salzano (Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication in the School of Communication and Journalism)

Abstract : Humans reason about everyday situations by making commonsense-based inferences, derived both from explicitly stated information and implicit, unstated knowledge. In this thesis, I investigate whether NLP models have different aspects of causal knowledge about events and how to improve their understanding of narratives and plans.
Answering questions about why people perform actions in a narrative can test whether NLP systems contain and can effectively apply causal knowledge about events. I introduce TellMeWhy, a dataset concerning why characters in short narratives perform the actions described. An evaluation of then SOTA finetuned models show that they are far worse than humans. To improve models, it is important to understand what aspects of causal knowledge they need and how to best use external sources to inject this knowledge. In KnowWhy, I analyze different ways of injecting knowledge into models, which is difficult since we do not know apriori what type of knowledge will be needed to answer a question, hence requiring a ranking model to pick the most important inference. Results show that this retrieved knowledge helps models of all sizes, thereby improving their understanding of narratives.
Next, I study whether models can reason about causal aspects of plans. I focus on testing whether they understand the underlying causal dependencies reflected in the temporal order of a plan's steps. I introduce CAT-Bench, and find that SOTA models are underwhelming, and that model answers are not consistent across questions about the same step pairs. In their current state, these models cannot yet reliably be used for complex user-facing tasks. I then measure contemporary models' ability to perform user-facing and user-centric plan customization. I introduce the use of semi-symbolic edits in large language model (LLM) based agents and test several multi-LLM-agent architectures for plan customization. While LLMs still lack the ability to understand complex customization hints, my results suggest that LLM-based architectures may be worth exploring further for other customization applications. Finally, I distill complex reasoning capabilities into small language models (SLMs) using synthetic data that reflects a decomposition-then-editing process for plan customization. I demonstrate that explicitly teaching this latent causal reasoning significantly improves the quality of SLM-generated customizations. Overall, my work has improved how well NLP models understand complex reasoning associated with events in different contexts.

Speaker: Yash Kumar Lal

Location: NCS 220 or Zoom https://stonybrook.zoom.us/j/95849648243?pwd=dgPpZtDpgwQrK9z1SaPpNbBifaorzk.1
Abstract: Modern technologies enable enhanced integrity and privacy guarantees not just for data, but also for computation. This is perhaps most emphatically demonstrated by the steady rise of zero-knowledge proofs, which are short certificates that attest to the correctness of computations (e.g., an age verification check) without revealing any secret inputs (e.g., the birth date on a digital ID). This subtly powerful technology enables anonymous credentials, privacy-preserving machine learning, anonymous blockchains, and much more--making the question of efficient zero-knowledge proofs fundamental to modern secure systems. Echoing Moore's law for computing, zero-knowledge proofs have improved on this front by ten orders of magnitude in the last two decades. In this talk, I will discuss our work on overcoming a key bottleneck that has emerged in this development: memory efficiency.

Speaker: Abhiram Kothapalli is a postdoctoral scholar at the University of California, Berkeley, hosted by Sanjam Garg. He is a recent graduate of Carnegie Mellon University, where he earned his Ph.D. in Computer Science, advised by Bryan Parno. Previously, he was at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where he earned his B.S. in Computer Science and B.S. in Mathematics. Kothapalli's research develops cryptographic techniques aimed at scaling expressive privacy and integrity guarantees across the internet.

Location: NCS 120
Hieu Le presents Incorporating Physical Illumination Constraints into Deep Learning Shadow Detection and Removal (PhD Proposal)

Shadows provide useful cues to analyze the scene but also hamper many computer vision algorithms such as image segmentation, object detection or tracking. For those reasons, shadow detection and shadow removal have been well studied topics in computer vision. Early approaches for shadow detection and removal focus on physical illumination models of shadows. These methods can express, identify, and remove shadows in a physically plausible manner. However, these models are often hard to optimize and slow in inference due to reliance on hand-designed image features. On the other hand, recent deep-learning approaches have achieved breakthroughs in performances for both shadow detection and removal. They learn to extract useful features automatically through training while being extremely efficient in computation. However, these models are data-dependent, opaque and ignore the physical aspects of shadows.

We propose to incorporate physical illumination constraints into deep-learning frameworks. Thus the mapping learned by the deep-network closely follows the physics of shadows, enabling the network to systematically and realistically modify shadows in images. For shadow detection, we present a novel GAN framework in which the generator can generate realistic images with attenuated shadows that can be used to train a shadow detector. For shadow removal, we propose a method that uses deep-networks to estimate the unknown parameters for a shadow image formation model that removes shadows. The system outputs shadow-free images in high-quality with no image artifacts and achieves state-of-the-art shadow removal performance. Lastly, we propose a system trained without the need for any shadow-free images in which physical constraints play pivotal roles that enable training the networks.

For Zoom information, please email events@cs.stonybrook.edu.
AI is everywhere and so are the privacy concerns that come with it. At its core, the most common forms of AI we use today are online digital services and thus inherit the usual privacy risks. We'll take a look at indirect prompt injection- a technique that can trick AI tools into revealing or extracting private information as well as techniques being used in academic contexts to manipulate systems and even mislead researchers.

Register here for the online session.