AI on Campus: Your Thoughts, Your Future

Join the Conversation: Share Your Thoughts about Learning, Academics, and AI

The world of college is changing fast, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at the center of it. We are part of the Institute on AI, Pedagogy, and the Curriculum with AAC&U, and we need to hear from the people AI affects most: you!

This is an open discussion for all students to share their honest experiences, their top concerns, and their best ideas about AI in our academic environment. We'll be diving into these key questions:

  • How can AI actually make learning better or easier? What opportunities do you see for using AI tools to enhance your assignments, research, or skills?

  • What are your biggest worries about AI? Is it about cheating, being graded fairly, or preparing for the job market? How is AI impacting your workload or stress levels?

  • What specific tools, workshops, or policies would help you use AI responsibly and successfully? (Think training, software, or clear rules.)

Dates/Times:

  • Wednesday, 2/4 at 2pm

  • Thursday, 2/5 at 12pm

Please register in advance for the Zoom link.

Can't Make It? Share Your Feedback!

Don't worry if you can't attend! You can still share your thoughts via video in our AI Zoom Room or via email: rose.tirotta-esposito@stonybrook.edu.

Videos will not be shared publicly and comments will only be shared in aggregate.

Your voice matters. Come tell us how AI is affecting your studies, your stress, and your success!

  • Dr. Rose Tirotta-Esposito (Assistant Provost; Director of CELT)

  • Dr. Elizabeth Hewitt (Associate Professor in the Department of Technology and Society (DTS) in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences)

  • Chris Kretz (Associate Librarian and Head of Academic Engagement at SBU Libraries)

  • Prof. Rajiv Lajmi (Assistant Professor in the School of Health Professions and Chair of Applied Health Informatics)

  • Dr. Matthew Salzano (Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication in the School of Communication and Journalism)


Abstract:

Many real world complex problems are multi-step reasoning tasks. These range from analytic tasks such as answering questions to automation tasks where agents complete tasks on behalf of users.. Evaluation, datasets, and models for such tasks can be unreliable for multiple reasons. (i) Datasets often have annotation artifacts and biases, allowing models to take reasoning shortcuts. Such shortcuts can allow models to make effective guesses -- or, in a sense, cheat -- to achieve high performance without any multi-step reasoning. This issue is further exacerbated for complex tasks because as the number of the required reasoning steps increases, so do the avenues for bypassing those steps. (ii) Models trained on such dataset/s learn to solve the task by taking reasoning shortcuts instead of proper multi-step reasoning. As a result, these models are not robust (reliable) when evaluated in an out-of-distribution evaluation setting. (iii) Lastly, recent works have shown that language models can solve complex multi-step tasks by producing a step-by-step explanation without any training. However, these methods often hallucinate factually incorrect (i.e., unreliable) explanations when posed with knowledge-intensive tasks.

I address these challenges by carefully characterizing the requirements of robust multi-step reasoning and designing reliable evaluation datasets and training methods that necessitate thorough multi-step reasoning. In DiRe, I first formalize and introduce Disconnected Reasoning, i.e., reasoning that allows models to arrive at the correct answer by bypassing necessary reasoning steps, and use this formalization to measure how much multi-step reasoning a model does on a dataset. In MuSiQue, I built a multi-step reasoning dataset for QA from scratch that avoids cheatability via disconnected reasoning, providing a more reliable evaluation. In TeaBReaC, I developed a synthetically generated multi-step QA pretraining dataset designed to force models to avoid disconnected reasoning and learn reliable multi-step reasoning. In IRCoT, I address the reliability of model-generated multi-step reasoning chains by interleaving models' step-by-step reasoning with a step-by-step retrieval from an external corpus, resulting in more factually correct reasoning. Finally, in AppWorld, I built a multi-step reasoning dataset that requires highly interactive problem-solving in an environment carefully designed to ensure models need thorough reasoning to succeed.
Speaker: Harsh Trivedi

Location: NCS 220 or Zoom

https://stonybrook.zoom.us/j/99096379762?pwd=zYCJZQVxRuZd9BboscO4nlodCwsKBr.1
Join Stony Brook University's Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) for a bootcamp on how to use AI to enhance your teaching and courses. This event will demonstrate how ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and other generative AI platforms can support you in crafting learning objectives, writing exam questions, composing rubrics, and designing course content such as lesson plans, in-class activities, instructional videos, and more.

Register here.
University Libraries Present: Analyzing quantitative data can feel overwhelming without the right tools. In this workshop, SBU Libraries' Data Literacies Lead, Ahmad Pratama will show you how to master the basics of exploratory data analysis for quantitative data using Python. This workshop covers several techniques to help you uncover patterns and insights in your datasets.

Online RSVP via link: https://stonybrook.zoom.us/meeting/register/vEPycmDrQoGjFqkmsYHgxw
Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer a futuristic concept -- it is here, but its development, benefits, and risks remain unevenly distributed across industries, nations, and social groups. In this talk, Jieshu presents her research on the societal dimensions of AI from two perspectives: the forces shaping AI's development (backward-looking) and its current and potential impact on society (forward-looking). She first examines disparities in AI, including women's underrepresentation in AI patents and the geographic concentration of AI innovation, highlighting inequalities in who creates AI and who benefits from it. She then explores AI's societal impact, focusing on workforce transformation and the need for GenAI literacy. She will also discuss AI patents, AI's role in climate change mitigation and adaptation, potential environmental biases in LLMs, and gender-specific patterns in AI portrayals in science fiction.

Bio: Jieshu Wang is a Postdoctoral Research Scholar at Arizona State University (ASU), focusing on the social dimensions of artificial intelligence (AI). With a background in engineering, economics, communication, and science and technology studies, she examines how AI both shapes and is shaped by broader societal forces. Her research employs interdisciplinary methods to explore the social, political, and economic factors influencing AI development, as well as its role in innovation, the economy, the future of work, climate change mitigation, and popular culture. Jieshu holds a Ph.D. in Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology from ASU. She is also a science book translator and has translated six books.

Location: Old Computer Science, room 1310
The New York Academy of Sciences Presents AI for Materials: From Discovery to Production - A Virtual Symposium

Event Description: This interdisciplinary symposium covers the application of artificial intelligence (AI) throughout the entire life cycle of new materials -- from materials simulations and synthesis to translating research into high-volume industrial production.

Event Link & Registration: nyas.org/AI4Materials2020
Join librarian Christine Fena for an interactive workshop that invites you to explore AI tools firsthand, not just as users, but as critical investigators. Through playful experimentation and collaborative discovery, you'll uncover inherent biases, probe algorithmic flaws, and gain a deeper understanding of AI's limitations and societal impacts.

Register for the Zoom workshop here.