Building on foundational skills, AI in Management 201 - Intermediate Level explores strategies for using AI to enhance decision‑making, uncover insights from data, streamline workflows, and support team development. This in-person training is designed for any current or aspiring leader who currently uses AI and is interested in bringing their skills to the next level.


Location: Wang Center Room 201

As AI drives rapid change across professional fields, how do you bring these developments into your classroom? The CELT AI Panel Discussion will gather academic thought leaders to explore how generative AI is reshaping teaching, learning, and the knowledge students need for today's world. Our panelists will share practical strategies for integrating AI-related advancements into course content, highlight both opportunities and challenges, and discuss how educators can help students build critical thinking, ethical awareness, and hands-on experience with emerging AI technologies. Join us to examine how teaching can evolve alongside an AI-transformed society.

Register here.

The International Neuroethics Society (INS) Speaker Series on AI & Consciousness

Abstract: Colln Allen and I noted in our 2008 book Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong, that consciousness, a theory of mind, sociability, situational awareness and embodiment are all supra-rational (beyond reason) capabilities that contribute to making ethical decision Whether any of these can be fully instantiated in machines remains an open question. Nevertheless, moral decision making in the digital age will require an evolution in and refinement of specific skills for both humans and for AI. I call one of these evolutions in moral decision making capabilities tradeoff ethics and another a silent ethics. Aspects of this social, and not just technological evolution, will require research by neuroscientists.

Speaker Bio: Wendell Wallach has an international reputation as an expert on the ethics and governance of emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence and biotechnologies. He is also senior advisor to The Hastings Center and a scholar at the Yale University Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics where he chaired Technology and Ethics studies for eleven years. Wallach's latest book, a primer on emerging technologies, is entitled, A Dangerous Master: How to keep technology from slipping beyond our control. He co-authored (with Colin Allen) Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong. Wallach has been referred to as, a Godfather of AI Ethics.

Pre-register here (required): https://umaryland.zoom.us/meeting/register/sPpiR_drR4-9JYDhI2NhJg
Ready to stop taking notes and make your virtual meetings work for you? Join our upcoming workshop to master Zoom's built-in AI tools and streamline your workday. You'll learn how to generate instant AI Meeting Summaries to capture key action items effortlessly, use live in-meeting Q&A to ask Zoom AI questions and catch up on missed details in real time, and prompt Zoom to build sleek, professional virtual backgrounds on the fly. Please click the link below to register. We hope to see you there!

https://stonybrookuniversity.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_a9PVlBw0E1Bal1A?source=campus%20announcements&session=100910261600zoom



Matthew Salzano (Stony Brook), AI and DEIA: Getting at the Roots

Link to the talk (no pre-registration required this time): https://stonybrook.zoom.us/j/96209347479?pwd=Cs8fEfFdbXrGTC5cQgyHRb8Msh5vp8.1Meeting ID: 962 0934 7479 Passcode: 272489

Abstract: Conversations about AI and DEIA (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Access) often unwittingly assume that social problems can and should have technical fixes. Left unaddressed, scholars, advocates, and technologists inevitably miss important consequences in our proposed solutions, and focus on surface-level problems rather than addressing the root causes of inequity. Drawing from scholarship in communication, rhetoric, and critical digital studies, this talk explains how we are often trimming branches when we need to pull out roots -- and introduces new terms and questions that can help reorient our conversations about AI and DEIA.

Speaker Bio: Matthew Salzano, Ph.D., is a communication scholar researching new media technologies, user practices, and cultural trends that threaten to limit possibilities for diverse engagement in public argument, debate, and protest. His scholarship has appeared in journals like The Quarterly Journal of Speech, Critical Studies in Media Communication, and Women's Studies in Communication, and his research on DEIA, AI, and advocacy communications has been funded by the Waterhouse Family Institute at Villanova University. He is currently an Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access fellow in Ethical AI at Stony Brook University's School of Communication and Journalism and Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science.

Developing research questions & effective search strategies can be challenging, and the growing use of generative AI adds a new layer of complexity to the research process. This workshop will explore how generative AI can complement traditional research methods while navigating important considerations around accuracy, transparency, privacy, and reliability. No prior AI experience is required.

Location: Health Sciences Center, Room 2-154 or Online

Register to attend.

Tired of tedious, manual spreadsheet work? Learn how to prompt Gemini to generate quick, basic Apps Script snippets that simplify tasks, like mapping dates to university semesters.

Repetitive spreadsheet tasks--like sorting administrative dates into academic terms--can eat up hours of your week. Gemini makes it possible to build quick, self-contained micro-automation scripts using everyday, conversational language. We'll use plain-English prompts to ask Gemini for simple Google Apps Script code snippets. We'll use the example of mapping dates to university semesters: Instead of manually adding a Semester, we'll create a script that will look at the date and automatically add the appropriate semester. You will leave with a workflow to automate simple spreadsheet chores, eliminating manual errors and boosting efficiency.

In this session, you will:

  1. Locate and navigate the built-in Apps Script editor within Google Sheets and understand how basic micro-automations work.
  2. Craft targeted Gemini prompts that specify exactly which columns to read (e.g., event dates) and which columns to fill (e.g., academic semesters).
  3. Copy, paste, and execute Gemini-generated code snippets in Google Sheets safely--without writing a single line of code from scratch.
  4. Test and adapt simple scripts to confirm accuracy and identify other low-risk, repetitive data tasks in your daily workflow.

Register.
Abstract : Humans reason about everyday situations by making commonsense-based inferences, derived both from explicitly stated information and implicit, unstated knowledge. In this thesis, I investigate whether NLP models have different aspects of causal knowledge about events and how to improve their understanding of narratives and plans.
Answering questions about why people perform actions in a narrative can test whether NLP systems contain and can effectively apply causal knowledge about events. I introduce TellMeWhy, a dataset concerning why characters in short narratives perform the actions described. An evaluation of then SOTA finetuned models show that they are far worse than humans. To improve models, it is important to understand what aspects of causal knowledge they need and how to best use external sources to inject this knowledge. In KnowWhy, I analyze different ways of injecting knowledge into models, which is difficult since we do not know apriori what type of knowledge will be needed to answer a question, hence requiring a ranking model to pick the most important inference. Results show that this retrieved knowledge helps models of all sizes, thereby improving their understanding of narratives.
Next, I study whether models can reason about causal aspects of plans. I focus on testing whether they understand the underlying causal dependencies reflected in the temporal order of a plan's steps. I introduce CAT-Bench, and find that SOTA models are underwhelming, and that model answers are not consistent across questions about the same step pairs. In their current state, these models cannot yet reliably be used for complex user-facing tasks. I then measure contemporary models' ability to perform user-facing and user-centric plan customization. I introduce the use of semi-symbolic edits in large language model (LLM) based agents and test several multi-LLM-agent architectures for plan customization. While LLMs still lack the ability to understand complex customization hints, my results suggest that LLM-based architectures may be worth exploring further for other customization applications. Finally, I distill complex reasoning capabilities into small language models (SLMs) using synthetic data that reflects a decomposition-then-editing process for plan customization. I demonstrate that explicitly teaching this latent causal reasoning significantly improves the quality of SLM-generated customizations. Overall, my work has improved how well NLP models understand complex reasoning associated with events in different contexts.

Speaker: Yash Kumar Lal

Location: NCS 220 or Zoom https://stonybrook.zoom.us/j/95849648243?pwd=dgPpZtDpgwQrK9z1SaPpNbBifaorzk.1

The Program in Writing and Rhetoric
Invites you to
A Rhetorical/Deliberative Framework for AI Language Model Alignment
featuring
Prof Zoltan Majdik Professor
North Dakota State University
In this talk, Prof. Majdik proposes a framework for aligning LLMs with values grounded in the norms of rhetorical culture and deliberative democracy. Alongside long-standing AI alignment value targets like safety and transparency, this AI alignment framework assesses to what extent a language model exhibits human and humane values that foster communicative engagement, and it codifies approaches to tuning existing models to better align with such values.

Location: Humanities 1008