IACS and the Dept of Ecology and Evolution invite you to a PRODiG+ Fellowship Seminar.
Computational solutions for reconstructing the drivers of macroevolutionary change
Summary: Why do living things evolve along the precise trajectories they do? In this talk, I describe how we can use emerging computational approaches to reconstruct major evolutionary transitions and the ecological, developmental, and functional factors that helped to shape them.
Speaker: Dr. Caleb M. Gordon, a postdoctoral researcher at the Florida Museum of Natural History, integrates paleontology, machine learning, and 3D modeling to study how ancient mammals and reptiles evolved new behaviors.
Location: IACS Seminar Room, and via Zoom.
Zoom: https://us05web.zoom.us/j/85466330601?pwd=umexDI9TQahaA9SNbL3BdJrllSZLD0.1
Meeting ID: 854 6633 0601
Passcode: 7cVSZd
Computational solutions for reconstructing the drivers of macroevolutionary change
Summary: Why do living things evolve along the precise trajectories they do? In this talk, I describe how we can use emerging computational approaches to reconstruct major evolutionary transitions and the ecological, developmental, and functional factors that helped to shape them.
Speaker: Dr. Caleb M. Gordon, a postdoctoral researcher at the Florida Museum of Natural History, integrates paleontology, machine learning, and 3D modeling to study how ancient mammals and reptiles evolved new behaviors.
Location: IACS Seminar Room, and via Zoom.
Zoom: https://us05web.zoom.us/j/85466330601?pwd=umexDI9TQahaA9SNbL3BdJrllSZLD0.1
Meeting ID: 854 6633 0601
Passcode: 7cVSZd
CSE 600 Seminar Series | Fall 2025
Speaker: Prof. R Sekar
Speaker: Prof. R Sekar
Subject: RADIOLOGY GRAND ROUNDS CT Colonography: An Effective Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening- Judy Yee, M.D.
When: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 12:00 PM-1:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).
Where: JOIN ZOOM MEETING
Judy Yee, MD
Chair, Department of Radiology
Professor, Department of Radiology
Abdominal Imaging
Join Zoom Meeting
https://einsteinmed.zoom.us/j/
Meeting ID: 977 8219 0723
Passcode: 101083
Abstract:
Deep learning models have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of computer vision tasks, including image classification, semantic segmentation, etc. However, such success highly relies on a large amount of annotated data, which are expensive to obtain. Moreover, their performance often degrades when there exist distribution shifts between training and test data. Domain Adaptation overcomes these issues by transferring knowledge from a label-rich source domain to a related but different target domain. Despite its popularity, domain adaptation is still a challenging task, especially when the data distribution shifts are severe, while the target domain has no or few labeled data.
In this thesis, I develop four efficient domain adaptation approaches to improve model performance on the target domain. Firstly, inspired by the large-scale pretraining of Vision Transformers, I explore Transformer-based domain adaptation for stronger feature representation and design a safe training mechanism to avoid model collapse in the situation of a large domain gap. Secondly, I observe that source models have low confidences on the target data. To address this, I focus on the penultimate activations of target data and propose an adversarial training strategy to enhance model prediction confidences. Thirdly, I study using weak supervision from prior knowledge about target domain label distribution. A novel Knowledge-guided Unsupervised Domain Adaptation paradigm is devised, and a plug-in module is designed to rectify pseudo labels. Lastly, I step into the task of Active Domain Adaptation, where the labels of a small portion of target data can be inquired. I propose a novel active selection criterion based on the local context and devise a progressive augmentation module to better utilize queried target data. The robustness of domain adaptation approaches, in addition to accuracy, is critical yet under-explored. To conclude the thesis, I empirically study set prediction in domain adaptation using the tool of conformal prediction and conformal training.
Location: New Computer Science Bldg., Room 120
Zoom Link: https://stonybrook.zoom.
Passcode: 466399
Abstract: Recent work in NLP uses debates between multiple LLMs to arrive at a more accurate conclusion. Earlier chain-of-thought prompting also shows improvements in accuracy when the model is asked to provide step-by-step reasoning in its response. Many publications since have developed strategies to improve the reasoning of model output with the goal of generating a more accurate result. However, even when asked to provide problem solving steps, the content of the reasoning provided by models is not well studied for all tasks and sometimes contains errors or conflicting statements even when the final result is correct. In fact, when evaluated across reasoning tasks, evidence shows that LLMs are not learning how to reason but are instead mimicking relevant solutions from their training sets.
By studying and evaluating the argumentation that LLMs provide, we can determine factors that may benefit or hinder the model's ability to give a complete, cohesive, and thorough answer. While there are signs that LLMs pattern match, finding where, when, and why this fails is valuable, as there may be ways to help the model imitate solutions that are more relevant to the task it is attempting to solve. Determining when pattern matching is not enough could show an area of improvement for future generations of LLMs. This research may separately aid in work on human-(AI)agent and inter-agent interaction. Specifically, frameworks could be used to determine when and why other models or humans are convinced by LLM-generated responses and which argument methods cause other models to change their response. Our current research in systematic versus heuristic cues shows that large language models sometimes present systematic or heuristic reasoning patterns based on prompting. Future research aims to explore other methods of classifying argumentation.
Speaker: Kiera Gross
Joining link: https://meet.google.com/xae-ywpv-udo
By studying and evaluating the argumentation that LLMs provide, we can determine factors that may benefit or hinder the model's ability to give a complete, cohesive, and thorough answer. While there are signs that LLMs pattern match, finding where, when, and why this fails is valuable, as there may be ways to help the model imitate solutions that are more relevant to the task it is attempting to solve. Determining when pattern matching is not enough could show an area of improvement for future generations of LLMs. This research may separately aid in work on human-(AI)agent and inter-agent interaction. Specifically, frameworks could be used to determine when and why other models or humans are convinced by LLM-generated responses and which argument methods cause other models to change their response. Our current research in systematic versus heuristic cues shows that large language models sometimes present systematic or heuristic reasoning patterns based on prompting. Future research aims to explore other methods of classifying argumentation.
Speaker: Kiera Gross
Joining link: https://meet.google.com/xae-ywpv-udo
The INS (International Neuroethics Society) AI and Consciousness Affinity Group is hosting a talk titled Bringing Trustworthiness in Generative AI and Agentic AI Using Thought Knowledge Graphs featuring speaker Manas Gaur, a computer scientist at UMBC.
The talk will examine the interplay between Thought Knowledge Graphs (TKGs) and how they can form more trustworthy and reasoning-based responses in AI. They will also discuss introducing novel methods on implementing TKGs and their overall impact on creating more trustworthy AI systems.
The talk will be held online via Zoom on Monday, December 2 at 1:00pm (EST).
Register to attend.
The talk will examine the interplay between Thought Knowledge Graphs (TKGs) and how they can form more trustworthy and reasoning-based responses in AI. They will also discuss introducing novel methods on implementing TKGs and their overall impact on creating more trustworthy AI systems.
The talk will be held online via Zoom on Monday, December 2 at 1:00pm (EST).
Register to attend.
CSE 600 Seminar Series | Fall 2025
Abstract:
We often talk about AI as if it begins with a dataset and ends with an application. But behind every model lie two sets of actors who are rarely acknowledged in technical documentation: the workers who train AI systems and the researchers who try to make sense of them. This talk brings both groups into view.
Dr. Ben Zhang will offer an on-the-ground examination of the prevailing values and invisible labor that underpin commercial AI production and data production. Drawing on ethnographic research inside AI data annotation centers in China, he introduces the concept of precision labor to unpack the labor dimension of constructing, managing, and performing technical accuracy. This concept highlights the hidden and excessive labor required to reconcile the ambiguity and uncertainty involved in AI training. A precision labor lens challenges the legitimacy and sustainability of the relentless pursuit of technical accuracy, raising new questions about its consequences and implications.
On the other end of the pipeline, as LLMs become embedded in society, social scientists like Dr. Jieshu Wang is scrutinizing their potential biases while employing them as research tools. She will present her recent work auditing LLM responses across different contexts, revealing that LLMs exhibit varying levels of environmental awareness and disproportionately reward institutional prestige in peer-review simulations. She also demonstrates how LLMs can serve as useful tools in social-science pipelines, e.g., extracting location information, inferring demographics, parsing citations, mapping social networks, and analyzing occupational data.
By placing these two worlds side by side - the labor of training AI and the scholarly efforts to study it - we show why responsible AI should go beyond the deployment phase - emphasizing fairness audits, and model explainability. It requires reimaging the values, labor regimes, and social science practices that shape AI systems from annotation to analysis.
Bios:
Dr. Jieshu Wang is an interdisciplinary researcher studying the human and social dimensions of artificial intelligence (AI) and how people can thrive in an AI-integrated future. She combines computational methods with qualitative insights to trace technology trends and understand their broader societal impact. She earned her Ph.D. in Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology from Arizona State University, after earlier degrees in Civil Engineering, Economics, and Science and Technology Studies. She has also worked as a patent examiner, an editor at a popular science magazine, and co-founded Synced (机器之心), an AI-focused media company in China. Her research looks both backward and forward. Backward-looking, she examines how AI are created, who creates them, and who is missing from the process. Forward-looking, she studies how AI is transforming the way we live, connect, invent, work, and adapt, as well as how AI might help address challenges such as climate change and workforce transitions.
Dr. Ben Zhang is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology. His research explores the production and sociotechnical impacts of AI systems in critical areas such as work, health, and sustainability. Drawing from his background in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Human-Centered AI, and Science and Technology Studies (STS), he employs a life-cycle-centered approach to holistically examine the promises and harms of these systems and to inform the design of responsible AI infrastructures across their development, deployment, and governance. Ben received his Ph.D. in Information Science from the University of Michigan. Ben's work has been supported by competitive awards and fellowships, including the University of Michigan Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship and the Weizenbaum Fellowship. His research has appeared in premier computing venues, including ACM CHI, ACM CSCW, and AAAI ICWSM.
Location: NCS 120
Abstract:
We often talk about AI as if it begins with a dataset and ends with an application. But behind every model lie two sets of actors who are rarely acknowledged in technical documentation: the workers who train AI systems and the researchers who try to make sense of them. This talk brings both groups into view.
Dr. Ben Zhang will offer an on-the-ground examination of the prevailing values and invisible labor that underpin commercial AI production and data production. Drawing on ethnographic research inside AI data annotation centers in China, he introduces the concept of precision labor to unpack the labor dimension of constructing, managing, and performing technical accuracy. This concept highlights the hidden and excessive labor required to reconcile the ambiguity and uncertainty involved in AI training. A precision labor lens challenges the legitimacy and sustainability of the relentless pursuit of technical accuracy, raising new questions about its consequences and implications.
On the other end of the pipeline, as LLMs become embedded in society, social scientists like Dr. Jieshu Wang is scrutinizing their potential biases while employing them as research tools. She will present her recent work auditing LLM responses across different contexts, revealing that LLMs exhibit varying levels of environmental awareness and disproportionately reward institutional prestige in peer-review simulations. She also demonstrates how LLMs can serve as useful tools in social-science pipelines, e.g., extracting location information, inferring demographics, parsing citations, mapping social networks, and analyzing occupational data.
By placing these two worlds side by side - the labor of training AI and the scholarly efforts to study it - we show why responsible AI should go beyond the deployment phase - emphasizing fairness audits, and model explainability. It requires reimaging the values, labor regimes, and social science practices that shape AI systems from annotation to analysis.
Bios:
Dr. Jieshu Wang is an interdisciplinary researcher studying the human and social dimensions of artificial intelligence (AI) and how people can thrive in an AI-integrated future. She combines computational methods with qualitative insights to trace technology trends and understand their broader societal impact. She earned her Ph.D. in Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology from Arizona State University, after earlier degrees in Civil Engineering, Economics, and Science and Technology Studies. She has also worked as a patent examiner, an editor at a popular science magazine, and co-founded Synced (机器之心), an AI-focused media company in China. Her research looks both backward and forward. Backward-looking, she examines how AI are created, who creates them, and who is missing from the process. Forward-looking, she studies how AI is transforming the way we live, connect, invent, work, and adapt, as well as how AI might help address challenges such as climate change and workforce transitions.
Dr. Ben Zhang is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology. His research explores the production and sociotechnical impacts of AI systems in critical areas such as work, health, and sustainability. Drawing from his background in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Human-Centered AI, and Science and Technology Studies (STS), he employs a life-cycle-centered approach to holistically examine the promises and harms of these systems and to inform the design of responsible AI infrastructures across their development, deployment, and governance. Ben received his Ph.D. in Information Science from the University of Michigan. Ben's work has been supported by competitive awards and fellowships, including the University of Michigan Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship and the Weizenbaum Fellowship. His research has appeared in premier computing venues, including ACM CHI, ACM CSCW, and AAAI ICWSM.
Location: NCS 120
The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2025 will be held from June 11th to June 15th, 2025, at the Music City Center, Nashville, TN.
The IEEE / CVF Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR) is the premier annual computer vision event comprising the main conference and several co-located workshops and short courses. With its high quality and low cost, it provides an exceptional value for students, academics and industry researchers.
Register here.