Abstract: DeepSeek-R1-Zero has shown that reinforcement learning (RL) at scale can directly enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs without supervised fine-tuning. In this work, we critically examine R1-Zero-like training by analyzing its two core components: base models and RL. We investigate a wide range of base models, including DeepSeek-V3-Base, to understand how pretraining characteristics influence RL performance. Our analysis reveals that DeepSeek-V3-Base already exhibit ''Aha moment'', while Qwen2.5 base models demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities even without prompt templates, suggesting potential pretraining biases. Additionally, we identify an optimization bias in Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), which artificially increases response length (especially for incorrect outputs) during training. To address this, we introduce Dr. GRPO, an unbiased optimization method that improves token efficiency while maintaining reasoning performance. Leveraging these insights, we present a minimalist R1-Zero recipe that achieves 43.3% accuracy on AIME 2024 with a 7B base model, establishing a new state-of-the-art.

Speaker: Md. Saqib Hasan

Location: CS2311

Join us at the Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) for an engaging workshop on Generative AI. This Zoom workshop is designed for faculty and staff members seeking to enhance their teaching methods and assessment strategies, foster student engagement, and navigate the evolving landscape of AI tools. Recording and slides will be sent to you.

Register here: https://stonybrook.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJ0qceisrjsrE9w1QtMkvSVw4lmr4h4x_Vqu



Place:  https://stonybrook.zoom.us/j/99167126152?pwd=TFpEYzM0aFhiOFJxSFJEb1JSS3YyQT09  

Time: 3 PM EST - Dec, 16th, 2020 

Abstract: 

Shadows provide useful cues to analyze visual scenes but also hamper many computer vision algorithms such as image segmentation, object detection, or tracking. For those reasons, shadow detection and shadow removal have been well-studied in computer vision.

Early work on shadow detection and removal focused on physical illumination models of shadows. These methods can express, identify, and remove shadows in a physically plausible manner. However, these models are often hard to optimize and are slow during inference due to their reliance on hand-designed image features. Recently, deep-learning approaches have achieved breakthroughs in performance for both shadow detection and removal. They learn to extract useful features through training while being extremely efficient during inference. However, these models are data-dependent, opaque, and ignore the physical aspects of shadows. Thus they often lack generalization and produce inconsistent results.

We propose incorporating physical illumination constraints of shadows into deep-learning models. These constraints force the networks to more closely follow the physics of shadows, enabling them to systematically and realistically modify shadows in images. For shadow detection, we present a novel Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) based model where the generator learns to generate images with realistic attenuated shadows that can be used to train a shadow detector. For shadow removal, we propose a method that uses deep-networks to estimate the unknown parameters of a shadow image formation model that removes shadows. The system outputs high-quality shadow-free images with little or no image artifacts and achieves state-of-the-art performance in shadow removal when trained on a fully-supervised setting. Moreover, the system is easy to train and constrain since the shadow removal mapping is strictly defined by the simplified illumination model with interpretable parameters. Thus, it can be trained even with a much weaker form of supervision signal. In particular, we show that we can use two sets of patches, shadow and shadow-free, to train our shadow decomposition framework via an adversarial system. These patches are cropped from the shadow images themselves.
Therefore, this is the first deep-learning method for shadow removal that can be trained without any shadow-free images, providing an alternative solution to the paired data dependency issue. The advantage of this training scheme is even more pronounced when tested on a novel domain such as video shadow removal where the method can be fine-tuned on a testing video with only the shadow masks generated by a pre-trained shadow detector and further improves shadow removal results.
Join us to share your thoughts about teaching, learning, and AI!

The landscape of higher education is rapidly evolving with the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Through the Institute on AI, Pedagogy, and the Curriculum with AAC&U, we are exploring ways that we can better address AI in teaching and learning. We want to hear your experiences, your concerns, and your ideas.

This is an open discussion for all faculty and staff to share their perspectives on the opportunities and challenges AI presents in our academic environment.

We'll be exploring critical questions like:
  • In the age of AI, what are the opportunities you see for enriching the classroom and curriculum? How can it enhance student learning or your professional practice?
  • What are the most significant challenges and concerns that AI raises for you regarding academics, student integrity, or your workload?
  • What resources (tools, training, technical support, policy guidance, etc.) do you need to feel confident and successful in the age of AI?
Date: Monday, December 1st
Time: 12:30pm-1:45pm
Location: West Campus - Melville Library, Special Collections Seminar Room (the room is to the left at the top of the first flight of stairs from the Melville lobby)
or
Date: Wednesday, December 3rd
Time: 10:30am-11:45am
Location: East Campus - HSC 2-154

Please register in advance so we can confirm the room.

Note: Videos will not be shared publicly and comments will only be shared in aggregate.

Your input is vital. From pedagogy to assessment, your insights will be critical. We look forward to a thoughtful and productive conversation!
  • Dr. Rose Tirotta-Esposito (Assistant Provost; Director of CELT)
  • Dr. Elizabeth Hewitt (Associate Professor in the Department of Technology and Society (DTS) in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences)
  • Chris Kretz (Associate Librarian and Head of Academic Engagement at SBU Libraries)
  • Prof. Rajiv Lajmi (Assistant Professor in the School of Health Professions and Chair of Applied Health Informatics)
  • Dr. Matthew Salzano (Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication in the School of Communication and Journalism)
The Challenges of Machine Learning in Adversarial Settings by Patrick McDaniel, Pennsylvania State University

Abstract: Advances in AI and machine learning have enabled new applications and services to interpret and process inputs in previously unthinkable complex environments. Autonomous cars, data analytics, adaptive communication and self-aware software systems are now revolutionizing markets by achieving or exceeding human performance. In this talk, I consider the evolving use of machine learning in security-sensitive contexts and explore why many systems are vulnerable to nonobvious and potentially dangerous manipulation. Here, we examine sensitivity in any application whose misuse might lead to harm--for instance, forcing adaptive network in an unstable state, crashing an autonomous vehicle or bypassing an adult content filter. I explore the use of machine learning in this area particularly in light of recent discoveries in the creation of adversarial samples and defenses against them and posit on future attacks on machine learning. The talk is concluded with a discussion of the technological and societal challenges we face as a result of current and future advances in intelligent computing.

Bio: Patrick McDaniel is the William L. Weiss Professor of Information and Communications Technology and Director of the Institute for Networking and Security Research in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Pennsylvania State University. Professor McDaniel is also a Fellow of the IEEE and ACM and the director of the NSF Frontier Center for Trustworthy Machine Learning. He also served as the program manager and lead scientist for the Army Research Laboratory's Cyber-Security Collaborative Research Alliance from 2013 to 2018. Patrick's research centrally focuses on a wide range of topics in computer and network security and technical public policy. Prior to joining Penn State in 2004, he was a senior research staff member at AT&T Labs-Research.

We invite faculty to deliver a 10-minute presentation during our afternoon session at the CELT Symposium on April 11, 2025. Showcase how you use emerging technology (i.e. AI, VR, etc.) to support diverse student populations and enhance learning experiences. Share your innovative strategies and inspire others!

CELT Symposium Theme: A New Era of Inclusivity and Innovation in Higher Education

https://t.e2ma.net/click/5w0gph/5wwlu4oe/9v63j6
Abstract: Recent work in NLP uses debates between multiple LLMs to arrive at a more accurate conclusion. Earlier chain-of-thought prompting also shows improvements in accuracy when the model is asked to provide step-by-step reasoning in its response. Many publications since have developed strategies to improve the reasoning of model output with the goal of generating a more accurate result. However, even when asked to provide problem solving steps, the content of the reasoning provided by models is not well studied for all tasks and sometimes contains errors or conflicting statements even when the final result is correct. In fact, when evaluated across reasoning tasks, evidence shows that LLMs are not learning how to reason but are instead mimicking relevant solutions from their training sets.
By studying and evaluating the argumentation that LLMs provide, we can determine factors that may benefit or hinder the model's ability to give a complete, cohesive, and thorough answer. While there are signs that LLMs pattern match, finding where, when, and why this fails is valuable, as there may be ways to help the model imitate solutions that are more relevant to the task it is attempting to solve. Determining when pattern matching is not enough could show an area of improvement for future generations of LLMs. This research may separately aid in work on human-(AI)agent and inter-agent interaction. Specifically, frameworks could be used to determine when and why other models or humans are convinced by LLM-generated responses and which argument methods cause other models to change their response. Our current research in systematic versus heuristic cues shows that large language models sometimes present systematic or heuristic reasoning patterns based on prompting. Future research aims to explore other methods of classifying argumentation.

Speaker: Kiera Gross

Joining link: https://meet.google.com/xae-ywpv-udo



Abstract: The current approach to materials design, driven by strategic experimentation and supported by physics-based simulation across relevant scales, has been the standard for decades. While the theoretical component in this workflow provides valuable understanding of material behavior, it often fails to deliver actionable guidance for implementation. Advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML), together with high-performance computing (HPC), now offer a viable pathway to close this gap and accelerate both discovery and process optimization. This presentation will outline practical approaches for integrating AI/ML with HPC-enabled, high-throughput computation to explore high-dimensional search spaces. Examples will include the development of engineering alloys for extreme environments, the use of neural networks to rapidly improve computational thermodynamic models, and vapor processing optimization for the manufacturing of ultra-high-temperature ceramics. I will highlight how scientific insight and domain expertise remain essential for translating surrogate model predictions into impactful outcomes. Finally, I will conclude with current challenges and future opportunities for AI/HPC-driven materials research.

Speaker: Dongwon Shin
This seminar will be held in person and online

Join Zoom Meeting: https://stonybrook.zoom.us/j/93730374357?pwd=YDLJ7ELqOQnTZEQhlN8Pa4TuhaiFK8.1
AI can help you write, you hear. AI can save you time, leverage your skills, enhance your productivity. . . . But you also hear: AI output is not reliable, not adequate for advanced tasks/learning, not ethical to use -- you could get in deep trouble for using AI tools without adequate mastery and caution. Which way is it?
Come join this hands-on workshop where you will explore AI tools and their affordances. Engage in writing tasks to learn how to use AI tools effectively and responsibly.
Sign up for a seat now: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd0iDTKkTYnkxFd4LkgqbtP97zQSS4FI_MiPVm7p6IY5SGwSg/viewform
Abstract Driving intelligence test is critical to the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles. The prevailing approach tests autonomous vehicles in life- like simulations of the naturalistic driving environment. However, due to the high dimensionality of the environment and the rareness of safety-critical events, hundreds of millions of miles would be required to demonstrate the safety performance of autonomous vehicles, which is severely inefficient. We discover that sparse but adversarial adjustments to the naturalistic driving environment, resulting in the naturalistic and adversarial driving environment, can significantly reduce the required test miles without loss of evaluation unbiasedness. By training the background vehicles to learn when to execute what adversarial maneuver, the proposed environment becomes an intelligent environment for driving intelligence testing. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed environment in a highway-driving simulation. Comparing with the naturalistic driving environment, the proposed environment can accelerate the evaluation process by multiple orders of magnitude. ZOOM LINK: Meeting ID: 950 6760 3617; Passcode: 426506 https://stonybrook.zoom.us/j/95067603617?pwd=dXQybEprSkNlTFY3WHlWYjViUG95UT09 Bio Professor Henry Liu is a professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. He is also a Research Professor at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute and the Director for the Center for Connected and Automated Transportation (USDOT Region 5 University Transportation Center). Prof. Liu conducts interdisciplinary research at the interface between civil and mechanical engineering. Specifically, his scholarly interests concern traffic flow monitoring, modeling, and control, as well as testing and evaluation of connected and automated vehicles. He has published more than 100 refereed journal papers and is listed as one of the top 50 leading authors in the past 50 years (1969-2019) in the prestigious Transportation Research journal. Professor Liu and his work have been widely recognized in public media for promoting smart transportation innovations. He has appeared on media outlets including CNBC, Forbes, Technode, etc. In 2019, Professor Liu was invited to testify on national transportation research agenda in front of the US House Subcommittee on Research and Technology. Professor Liu has nurtured a new generation of scholars, and some of his PhD students and postdocs have joined first class universities such as Columbia University, Purdue University, RPI, etc. Prof. Liu is the managing editor of Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems.